Case Study: How Bal Seal Engineering Streamlined Online Conversions
Bal Seal Engineering is a large firm specializing in custom design and engineering of seals used in engineering projects ranging from motor vehicles to medical tools, to spacecraft.
Their major touchpoint with their client base is the Design Request Form (DRF) on their website. Typically, users submit a design request which gets routed to Bal Seal’s sales team for processing and follow-up.
Working together with Brandastic, Bal Seal Engineering were able to simplify their customer intake process and streamline the buying process. Over time they saw a 50% Increase in conversions. Here’s how we worked together to make it happen.
A Slow, Confusing Sign-Up Process
Bal Seal’s DRF was long, convoluted, and hard to complete. It asked a lot of technical specification questions upfront that deterred users, especially for those customers early in their engineering workflows.
This long process contributed to lower conversion rates and a lack of efficiency in their sales process.
The form had a conversion rate of only 4% with no way to track partial entries. This low result meant that contact information on potential leads was not getting funneled to sales, for potential follow up and conversions.
Beginning With a Strategic Review
When Bal Seal began working with Brandastic, we knew there would need to be a lot of research before the redesign. An initial meeting reviewed the current process and discussed the goals of the form for all user types to confirm the necessary fields.
The main focus was on how to intake process should affect users offline in the sales funnel, since their internal team would be processing submissions.
Wireframing with Adobe XD
After a full review of the client’s needs, the Brandastic team had enough information to begin creating the initial structure of the new form.
Using digital wireframing helped to get user feedback for each version. We built all the wireframe pages in Adobe XD, which gives us the ability to click through the form as a regular user would.
Very often, clients can get diverted into the design, which is counterproductive. At every stage, it’s important that the Bal Seal team was focussed on the goals behind the proposed changes rather than simply the design prototypes.
High-Fidelity Prototypes + User Feedback
Once we showed the client our initial ideas for the form fields along with page structure and applied their feedback, we moved into building a high-fidelity prototype for the Design Request Form.
Using Invision’s prototyping tools, we were able to design out the new pages according to the rebrand’s guidelines. This also included hotspots for the client to click through and simulate walking through the form’s flow before spending dev hours to build.
The final design that the client settled on was a three-step form that was compressed into collecting key information: contact info, primary product type, and comments/files.
This new form suppled enough basic information for Bal Seal’s sales team to use as touchpoints and to expand on via client contact.
This new DRF solved the issue of asking for too much information up front and intimidating users.
A/B Testing with Google Optimize
The initial launch of the redesigned DRF was intended to gather baseline data for the facelift, to see how much impact a new design and simplified form would have.
A month or so after launch, Bal Seal reached out to our team to move forward with A/B testing the DRF.
The two form versions tested were:
- A – Multi-page (3-step) form (4.8% conversion baseline)
- B – Single-page (1-step) form
The development included using Google Optimize due to its integration with Analytics and Tag Manager.
The Google Optimize tool handled a lot of the brunt work in terms of collecting session information and displaying the A/B version so that we didn’t have to custom code any scripts for tracking sessions on each version.
This allowed Brandastic and Bal Seal to focus on results rather than technicalities. It also removed the need for the client to go digging for relevant information, as it was presented in the Analyze dashboard.
Increased Conversions and Easier Customization
After concluding the A/B test, which ran for 30-50 days, there was no clear leader between the two form versions.
However, the client selected the single-page version of the form so that users wouldn’t have to click through different pages and potentially bounce off.
A single page form also means that it’s easier to edit information by scrolling up and down rather than clicking back and forth through pages (even with only three steps).
Further user data and behavior can be captured with the use of Hotjar and more significant differences between the A/B versions of the form.
Beal Seal continued to run their selected version of the DRF form and they have continued to see positive conversion rates that back up the experiment.